Meth madness
Last week, New Zealand Police announced that they had located 1000 clandestine drug laboratories since official recording began ten years ago. In 1996 they located just one lab. Lucky lab 1000 was the 184th for 2006.
"Quality intelligence and increased understanding of the dynamics of illicit drug markets mean we are continually improving our work in zeroing in on the supply chains and networks of manufacturers and dealers," said Assistant Commissioner Peter Marshall. But is it quality intelligence and increased understanding? Or a decade of insanity ("doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results")? I guess that depends on what results you're trying to achieve.
Since 1996 the police have
- Wasted an estimated $500,000,000 "fighting P".
- Filled our jails to overflowing with clandestine laboratory technicians, at a cost of $50,000 per inmate per year.
- Ruined hundreds of lives (it's generally accepted that a sentence to life imprisonment - the penalty for manufacturing Class A drugs - is ruinous).
- Reduced the availability of methamphetamine.
- Reduced the number of clan labs.
- Stopped a recorded increase in violent crime.
- Stopped children using P "just to feel normal".
- Stopped children's milk for Weetbix being kept in the fridge next to P lab chemicals.
Anyone seen Elvis?
3 Comments:
The police are in the long term probably loosing in all of the areas you mention in terms of most crime not just drugs. As with some other crimes it could be that they are wasting their effort (maybe the police shouldn't even pretend that house theft is illegal), or it could be they are just slowly loosing a battle absolutely critical to society.
Prof James Roumaset, Economics, Hawaii U. wrote a superb analysis on meth (ice) and why it is prevelent that New Zealand can take a good lesson from. Hawaii's island state, position off the major drug routes (like us, no spillage into the market) and cultural factors and an enforcment of the the law (yep, those UN conventions again) that where the rules are the same.. the shit is the same. James shows that elevated enforcment of cannabis (pokalo) in Hawaii LEADS to correlate prevelence and harms from meth.
Wow...
Now there is a thought! Pot ENFORCMENT = meth prevelence. So who's responsible now?
Of course stricter enforcement on Cannibis leads to higher use and pushing of Meth. Due to the fact that higher enforcement makes it a better deal to manufacture meth due to the high return on investment vs pot, hence the incentive to push it.
Milton friedman and others have demonstrated that as enforcement is increased, the demand for crack, meth, speedballs and other dangerous, impure, highly addictive and strong substances increases.
The same thing *will* happen in New Zealand if BZP is criminalised. Its disgusting really.
Post a Comment
<< Home